WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "db9fe5d7-ca18-4961-8e05-eb3a71358701"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "381", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "381"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:serve.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000381", "sets": ["153"]}, "author_link": ["3476"], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2008-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "第2号", "bibliographicPageEnd": "138", "bibliographicPageStart": "123", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "第20巻", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "聖学院大学論叢"}, {"bibliographic_title": "The Journal of Seigakuin University", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "As for the practice of Tsunekichi MASUBUCHI, it has been said to be the center till now the reading and understanding guidance that was main in a classic. However, in the problem unit credit system that was his characteristic guidance method, the activity of “discussion” occupied the important position. In addition, in the times when a unit credit system to attach great importance to experience was strongly recommended, he insisted clearly when it “was not possible for the unit credit system of the empiricism in the high school”. And he would emphasize the frame of language arts and tended he limited the “discussion” activity to performing learning to understand a work effectively, and it to be taught as a result of this to be conscious of a difference with the unit credit system of the empiricism. Therefore, by the “discussion” guidance of the increase deep water, an opposition axis was done a relativization of, and a student was in condition to be hard to do the remark that was able to be tied to one\u0027s life.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15052/00000375", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0915-2539", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "熊谷, 芳郎"}, {"creatorName": "クマガイ, ヨシロウ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "3476", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-09-12"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "3317.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "470.8 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 470800.0, "url": {"label": "熊谷芳郎_増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観_聖学院大学論叢20-2.pdf", "url": "https://serve.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/381/files/3317.pdf"}, "version_id": "db6ae2c8-edc7-46e4-b976-f7115ed9ca6f"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "「話し合い」", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "課題学習", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "「話し合い」の範囲", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "対立軸", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観 : 1957年までの「実践」から", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観 : 1957年までの「実践」から"}, {"subitem_title": "Tsunekichi MASUBUCHI’s the outlook on guidance of the “discussion”: From “practice” until 1957", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "3", "path": ["153"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15052/00000375", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-09-12"}, "publish_date": "2017-09-12", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "381", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観 : 1957年までの「実践」から"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観 : 1957年までの「実践」から
https://doi.org/10.15052/00000375
https://doi.org/10.15052/000003754ca35f50-f590-489b-81f8-bae3c77ea40a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
熊谷芳郎_増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観_聖学院大学論叢20-2.pdf (470.8 kB)
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-09-12 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観 : 1957年までの「実践」から | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Tsunekichi MASUBUCHI’s the outlook on guidance of the “discussion”: From “practice” until 1957 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 「話し合い」 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 課題学習 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 「話し合い」の範囲 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 対立軸 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15052/00000375 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
熊谷, 芳郎
× 熊谷, 芳郎 |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | As for the practice of Tsunekichi MASUBUCHI, it has been said to be the center till now the reading and understanding guidance that was main in a classic. However, in the problem unit credit system that was his characteristic guidance method, the activity of “discussion” occupied the important position. In addition, in the times when a unit credit system to attach great importance to experience was strongly recommended, he insisted clearly when it “was not possible for the unit credit system of the empiricism in the high school”. And he would emphasize the frame of language arts and tended he limited the “discussion” activity to performing learning to understand a work effectively, and it to be taught as a result of this to be conscious of a difference with the unit credit system of the empiricism. Therefore, by the “discussion” guidance of the increase deep water, an opposition axis was done a relativization of, and a student was in condition to be hard to do the remark that was able to be tied to one's life. | |||||
書誌情報 |
聖学院大学論叢 en : The Journal of Seigakuin University 巻 第20巻, 号 第2号, p. 123-138, 発行日 2008-03 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0915-2539 |