@article{oai:serve.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000113,
 author = {安酸, 敏眞},
 issue = {第2号},
 journal = {聖学院大学論叢, The Journal of Seigakuin University},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {The purpose of this study is to examine the Spinoza controversy between Moses Mendelssohn and Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi in the hope of laying the groundwork for elucidation of Lessing’s “Spinozism.” The controversy between Mendelssohn and Jacobi, which initially began as a private quarrel over the deceased Lessing’s “Spinozism” in the summner of  1783, eventually engaged almost all the best minds of late eighteenth-century Germany. Wizenmann, Herder, Goethe, Hamman, Kant, Reinhold and other eminent thinkers took part in the dispute. It led thus to the so-called Pantheismusstreit, a significant controversy that was to shape the main contours of nineteenth-century philosophy. This controversy is all the more important because it raised the “dilemma of a rational nihilism or an irrational fideism,” a central problem which preoccupied Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche. The origin of this controversy is the “Spinozistic confession” that Lessing, according to Jacobi, made in a private philosophical conversation with him in the summer of 1780. As Jacobi put it, Lessing confided his great secret of Spinozism by saying, “The orthodox concepts of the divinity are no longer for me. I cannot stand them. Hen kai Pan! [=One and All] I know naught else.” “There is no other philosophy but the philosophy of Spiniza.” Mendelssohn, Lessing’s most intimate friend for over thirty years, was shocked by the news that “Lessing in his final days was a firm Spinozist.” Hence the heated dispute over Lessing’s “Spinozism.” Mendelssohn sought to rescue his deceased friend from the infamy of being labeled a Spinozist by tailoring him into a champion of “rational theism” (der rationale Theismus) in the form of “a refined pantheism” (der geläuterte Pantheismus; der verfeinerte Pantheismus). Jacobi, on the other hand, regarded Lessing’s rational theism as a mere “exoteric cover” (eine exoterische Hülle) under which his esoteric Spinozism was hidden, maintaining that Lessing was a secret Spinozist. This study results in the suggestion that both Mendelssohn and Jacobi missed the real heart of Lessing’s thought because they interpreted him with their own self-interested frames of reference. Our next task, therefore, is to investigate Lessing’s allegedly Spinozistic ideas in their own right.},
 pages = {249--268},
 title = {レッシングの「スピノザ主義」（1）},
 volume = {第8巻},
 year = {1996},
 yomi = {ヤスカタ, トシマサ}
}