@article{oai:serve.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000121,
 author = {安酸, 敏眞},
 issue = {第2号},
 journal = {聖学院大学論叢, The Journal of Seigakuin University},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {The controversy between Moses Mendelssohn and Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, which initially began in the summer of 1783 as a private quarrel over the deceased Lessing’s “Spinozism,” eventually engaged almost all the best minds of late eighteenth-century Germany. Wizenmann, Herder, Goethe, Hamman, Kant, Reinhold, and other eminent thinkers took part in the dispute. It led to the Pantheismusstreit, a significant controversy that was to shape the main contours of nineteenth-century philosophy. This controversy is all the more important because it raised “the dilemma of a rational nihilism or an irrational fideism,” a central problem that preoccupied Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche. The origin of this controversy is the “Spinozistic confession” that Lessing, according to Jacobi, made in a private philosophical conversation with him in the summer of 1780. As Jacobi put it, Lessing confided his great secret of Spinozism by saying, “The orthodox concepts of the divinity are no longer for me. I cannot stand them. Hen kai Pan [One and All]! I know naught else.” “There is no other philosophy but the philosophy of Spinoza.” Mendelssohn, Lessing’s most intimate friend for over thirty years, was shocked by the news that “Lessing in his final days was a firm Spinozist.” Hence the heated dispute over Lessing’s “Spinozism.” Mendelssohn sought to rescue his deceased friend from the infamy of being a Spinozist by tailoring him into a champion of “rational theism” (der rationale Theismus) in the form of “a refined pantheism” (der geläuterte Pantheismus; der verfeinerte Pantheismus). Jacobi, on the other hand, maintaining that Lessing was a secret Spinozist, regarded Lessing’s rational theism as a mere “exoteric cover” (eine exoterische Hülle) under which his esoteric Spinozism was hidden. The purpose of this essay is to examine Lessing’s alleged “Spinozism” on the basis of our previous study of the “Spinoza controversy” between Mendelssohn and Jacobi. The present study shows that Lessing’s hen kai pan implies not Spinozistic pantheism as Jacobi claimed it to be, but a panentheistic world-view common to the spiritualistic tradition. With regard to Lessing’s hen kai pan, our study also indicates that a significant variant exists, a variant which maintains that a more authentic form of Lessing’s panentheism is hen ego kai panta [I am one and all]! As a result, Lessing is regarded as a harbinger of nineteenth-century German Subjektivitätsphilosophie which seeks to synthesize unity and plurality through the medium of subjectivity.},
 pages = {157--170},
 title = {レッシングの「スピノザ主義」（2）},
 volume = {第9巻},
 year = {1997},
 yomi = {ヤスカタ, トシマサ}
}