@article{oai:serve.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000381,
 author = {熊谷, 芳郎},
 issue = {第2号},
 journal = {聖学院大学論叢, The Journal of Seigakuin University},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {As for the practice of Tsunekichi MASUBUCHI, it has been said to be the center till now the reading and understanding guidance that was main in a classic. However, in the problem unit credit system that was his characteristic guidance method, the activity of “discussion” occupied the important position. In addition, in the times when a unit credit system to attach great importance to experience was strongly recommended, he insisted clearly when it “was not possible for the unit credit system of the empiricism in the high school”. And he would emphasize the frame of language arts and tended he limited the “discussion” activity to performing learning to understand a work effectively, and it to be taught as a result of this to be conscious of a difference with the unit credit system of the empiricism. Therefore, by the “discussion” guidance of the increase deep water, an opposition axis was done a relativization of, and a student was in condition to be hard to do the remark that was able to be tied to one's life.},
 pages = {123--138},
 title = {増淵恒吉の「話し合い」指導観 : 1957年までの「実践」から},
 volume = {第20巻},
 year = {2008},
 yomi = {クマガイ, ヨシロウ}
}